The subsequent great peripherals war has been waged over your ears. After every company on earth put out a gaming mouse and then a mechanical keyboard, now it’s time for headsets. So gaming headphone.
We realize you don’t wish to scroll through every single headset review when all you need is an easy answer: “What’s the very best gaming headset I can buy with my hard-earned dollars?” This page holds the answer you seek, no matter what your finances is.
We’ll keep updating our recommendations as we take a look at new releases and look for stronger contenders. For this particular latest update, we’ve reviewed several fancypants models, namely the Sennheiser Game Zero and and Sennheiser GSP 350, and the Audio-Technica ATH-AG1X. For additional earthly budgets, we’ve also tested the SteelSeries Arctis 7, the HyperX Cloud Revolver S, and also the Logitech G533, which debuts as our new best mid-range wireless headset.
Kingston doesn’t have similar pedigree inside the headset space as the competitors, although the HyperX Cloud is really a winning device at the cheap price.
Our 2016 headset recommendation remains pretty much exactly like our 2015 headset recommendation (and our 2014, for instance): The Kingston HyperX Cloud. Or, if you’re feeling a lttle bit fancier, the Cloud II. It’s comfortable, it may sound great, and (additionally) it’s relatively inexpensive. What else can you want within a headset?
True to the name, the HyperX Cloud is amongst the most comfortable headsets in the marketplace. It’s hefty, with a solid-metal construction that belies its cheap price, but sits feather-light around the head. The faux-leather earpieces are generously padded, oversized, and form an effective seal without squeezing too difficult.
Plus it sounds excellent. As I said within our review, this isn’t a studio-quality group of headphones. It’s got the typical gaming-centric bass boost plus a slick top end, but both of them are subtle enough the HyperX Cloud competes favorably with bluetooth headphone twice its price. There’s no Kingston-provided ways to adjust the sound, given that the HyperX Cloud connects through standard 3.5mm jacks, but you honestly shouldn’t have to tweak it at all out of the box. It appears pretty damn great.
Really the only downside is the microphone. It’s very flexible, which I appreciate, but has a tendency to get background noise and plosives while leaving your voice nasally and hollow.
The slightly-more-expensive HyperX Cloud II is, I do believe, more a lateral move than a noticeable difference over its predecessor. It swaps the 3.5mm connection for a 7.1-ready USB soundcard with better in-line controls and some noise cancellation in the microphone, but you wouldn’t notice a tremendous distinction between both the iterations and I’m uncertain the rise in cost is worth it.
Regardless, either model is a superb selection for a gaming headset. In a increasingly crowded market, the HyperX Cloud nails pretty much every major category with few significant compromises. I really hope the following model improves in the microphone, however for $80 it’s a steal.
The Cloud Stinger provides solid sound, serious comfort, plus an attractive design for everyone who just demands a “good enough” headset without the wallet-shock.
HyperX’s Cloud headset remains to be our favorite, however the company undercut themselves a little by releasing the HyperX Cloud Stinger. Listed at $50, it’s among the cheapest gaming headsets I’ve experienced from the reputable brand. And it’s good.
Sure, it’s not quite as good as the first Cloud, but for many individuals the Stinger ought to do perfectly. The plastic chassis lacks several of the original Cloud’s panache and durability, but looks high-end from your distance and sits pretty slim in the head. HyperX also solved the Cloud’s biggest issue lastly put a volume slider straight at the base in the right earcup and gave it a flip-to-mute microphone, so no longer fiddling within-line controls.
With regards to audio, the Cloud Stinger’s got an excellent mid-range with little to no distortion even at high volumes. The treble is a bit underpowered and the bass range is practically nonexistent, but 80 % associated with a given game, film, or song should come through clear and clean.
If you currently have a significant headset, specially the original Cloud, I wouldn’t repeat the Stinger is necessary-own. But if you’re looking for an excellent value on entry-level hardware, this really is it. It’s an insane bargain when you compare it for some other headsets from the same price tier.
Only under $100, Corsair’s Void Wireless is mostly an excellent wireless headset, but you will encounter some compromises.
Frankly speaking, Corsair doesn’t really have any competition within this category. Most decent wireless gaming headsets will run you $150 or more. Corsair’s Void Wireless is priced at a mere $100, which leaves it on its lonesome.
But even accounting for that vacuum, it’s excellent. Not phenomenal, mind you, but at the price you’re acquiring a bargain.
I wasn’t really sure what to make of the Void’s weird, diamond-shaped ear cups but after a little use I’m actually pretty pleased. The Void Wireless sits a little forward in the head, with all the band resting just above your forehead. It takes some becoming accustomed to, but the final result is less tension about the jaw and a lot more on the rear of the pinnacle where it’s less noticeable. I wouldn’t say it’s as comfortable as being the more traditional HyperX Cloud, but without a doubt I like it over its predecessor, the H2100.
The on-headset controls are fairly intuitive, by using a volume rocker at the base of the left ear, plus oversized buttons for power and mute in the side. And it’s got 16.8 million color RGB lighting, if that’s your bag.
The greatest design issue would be that the Void Wireless is heavy. It’s not a problem when sitting up, however, if you appear down or look up the headset has a propensity to slide around. I don’t know whether it’s due to the battery or maybe the metal-augmented construction, but your neck receives a workout with this particular headset.
Sound-wise, the Void Wireless still needs some work. It sounds passable, especially while gaming, but throwing on some music sets the Void Wireless’s limitations into stark relief. The low-end is muddy and distorted, and the whole selection of mid-to-high-end frequencies sounds slick, like you’ve applied too much compression.
You can adjust the headset’s sound in Corsair’s software, but Corsair’s software program is still a lttle bit unwieldy. Superior to last year, I do believe, but nevertheless not on par with Razer, SteelSeries, or Logitech. Also, many folks have reported troubles with firmware updates-not a great sign.
“This doesn’t appear to be an incredibly positive review,” you could say. And you’re right, it’s not. The Void Wireless is just not an amazing headset, as mentioned up top. But it is the ideal wireless gaming headset under $150, and given just how many wires are attached to my PC at any given moment, the benefit of cheap wireless might be worth sacrificing some sound quality.
Logitech’s G533 doesn’t have quite the identical breadth of options as being the G933, but a far more restrained design plus a bargain price turn this into a powerful contender for best wireless headset.
It’s a difficult call replacing our former mid-tier wireless pick, the Logitech G933, using its sibling-successor the Logitech G533. Like, really tough. The G933 is a wonderful headset, with crisp and well-balanced audio and some nifty design features (like being able to store the USB dongle inside an earcup).
But I’m still replacing it. Why? Well, aesthetics can be a huge reason. If you want an indicator how Logitech’s design language has shifted before year or so, look no further gam1ngheadset the G933 and G533. The G933 was all sharp angles and science fiction. The G533 alternatively is sleek, professional, restrained. By using a piano-black finish and soft curves, it seems such as a headset created by Audio-Technica or Sennheiser or possibly a more mainstream audio company-not really a “gaming” headset. I enjoy it.
The G533’s design is also functional. The microphone isn’t as hidden as I’d like, but that’s the sole flaw. The headset is lightweight, durable, and much less vise-grip tight than its predecessor.
In terms of audio fidelity? It’s not quite comparable to the G933, although the differences are minimal. The G533 lacks some oomph, especially at lower volumes, and its 7.1 support is subpar. Those are hardly reasons to keep away, though-the majority of people will run the headset loud enough to counteract the headset’s deficiency of presence, and virtual 7.1 is (in my view) basically always bad. The G533 is worse than the average, although the average remains something I choose to avoid day-to-day.
Regardless, the G933 continues to be being sold and is a perfectly good option for many, specifically if you want console support. The G533 is PC-only, whilst the G933 may be attached by 3.5mm cable with other devices. Of course, if you value comfort over audio fidelity, look into the SteelSeries Arctis 7 too-one more great choice.
Astro’s new A50 touts a brand new charging station and much better controls, but still doesn’t put the audio you might expect from the $300 couple of headphones.
SteelSeries Siberia 800 Wireless Dolby 7.1 Gaming Headset
After a new generation of the computer headset and Siberia 800 released in 2016, I was thinking we might finally break the tie that’s dominated our splurge headset pick over the past couple of years.
But once again, there’s no clear winner at that $300 price-though Astro certainly made some strides toward edging out SteelSeries.
The brand new A50’s biggest improvement is the battery. The latest model overcomes an extensive-running weak spot and packs in 12 to 15 hours of life-enough to get you through a good long day of gaming. Much better, it features gyroscopes in the ears that give it time to detect whether you’ve set it down. It automatically shuts off ten seconds later then, and after that turns back and connects to the PC on as soon as you pick it back up. Its base station also functions as a charger, a nice combination of function and beauty.